Myosteatosis is associated with coronary artery calcification in patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Myosteatosis, rather than low muscle mass, is the primary etiologic factor of sarcopenia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Myosteatosis may lead to a series of metabolic dysfunctions, such as insulin resistance, systematic inflammation, and oxidative stress, and all these dysfunctions are closely associated with the acceleration of T2DM and atherosclerosis. AIM: To investigate the association between myosteatosis and coronary artery calcification (CAC) in patients with T2DM. METHODS: Patients with T2DM, who had not experienced major cardiovascular events and had undergone both abdominal and thoracic computed tomography (CT) scans, were included. The mean skeletal muscle attenuation was assessed using abdominal CT images at the L3 level. The CAC score was determined from thoracic CT images using the Agatston scoring method. Myosteatosis was diagnosed according to Martin's criteria. Severe CAC (SCAC) was defined when the CAC score exceeded 300. Logistic regression and decision tree analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 652 patients with T2DM were enrolled. Among them, 167 (25.6%) patients had SCAC. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that myosteatosis, age, duration of diabetes, cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption were independent risk factors of SCAC. Myosteatosis was significantly associated with an increased risk of SCAC (OR = 2.381, P = 0.003). The association between myosteatosis and SCAC was significant in the younger patients (OR = 2.672, 95%CI: 1.477-4.834, P = 0.002), but not the older patients (OR = 1.456, 95%CI: 0.863-2.455, P = 0.188), and was more prominent in the population with lower risks of atherosclerosis. The decision tree analyses prioritized older age as the primary variable for SCAC. In older patients, cigarette smoking was the main contributing factor for SCAC, while in younger patients, it was myosteatosis. CONCLUSION: Myosteatosis is a novel risk factor for atherosclerosis in patients with T2DM, especially in the population with younger ages and fewer traditional risk factors.

Real-world study of antiresorptive-related osteonecrosis of jaw based on the US food and drug administration adverse event reporting system database.

Objective: This study aims to explore the risk signals of osteonecrosis of the jaw induced by antiresorptive drugs and provide references for the clinical safety application. Method: According to the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), from January 2004 to September 2021, we chose "Osteonecrosis of the jaw (10064658)" and "Exposed bone in jaw (10071014)" as preferred terms, "antiresorptive drugs" as the target drugs, and primary suspect drug as the drug role code in the dataset. We evaluated the association between drugs and adverse events by using reporting odds ratio (ROR) based on disproportionality analysis. We took the High-Level Terms (HLT) of MedDRA® as the classification level of indications to calculate ROR to compare the signal difference of ONJ in different indications. In addition, patients with antiresorptive-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw and the time of onset of the condition following different antiresorptive medications were collected for the study. Results: The FAERS contained 18,421 reports relating to jaw osteonecrosis from January 2004 to September 2021. A total of eight antiresorptive agents were included in the analysis. From high to low, the ROR of ONJ induced by antiresorptive agents (regardless of indication) is pamidronate (ROR = 494.8), zoledronic acid (ROR = 431.9), denosumab (ROR = 194.8), alendronate (ROR = 151.2), risedronate (ROR = 140.2), etidronic acid (ROR = 64.5), ibandronate (ROR = 40.8), and romosozumab (ROR = 6.4). HLT ROR values for "metabolic bone disorders" were the lowest for each drug, while HLT ROR values were high for "tumor-related indications," including breast and nipple neoplasms malignant, plasma cell myelomas, and prostatic neoplasms malignant. The onset time for osteonecrosis of the jaw as median (Q1, Q3), osteoporosis-related indications, and the onset time for ONJ were 730 (368, 1268), 489.5 (236.3, 909.8), 722.5 (314, 1055), 761 (368, 1720), and 153 (50, 346) for zoledronic acid, denosumab, ibandronate, risedronate, and romosozumab, respectively. Cancer-related indications: the onset time for ONJ were 680.5 (255.3, 1283), 488 (245, 851), and 696.5 (347, 1087) for zoledronic acid, denosumab, and pamidronate, respectively. Conclusion: When antiresorptive drugs are used for metastasis, they have the largest risk signal, followed by malignancy, and the smallest is osteoporosis. The onset time of ONJ may not be related to the indications. The onset time of ONJ for BPs was about 2 years, denosumab about 1.3 years, and romosozumab less than 1 year, which may be related to sequential treatment. When used according to the instructions, the risk of ONJ caused by denosumab was higher than that of zoledronic acid, regardless of the indication. Based on these findings, researchers will continue to monitor and identify risk factors.

The Remission Rate of Type 2 Diabetes Outpatients with Premixed Insulin: The Result of a 5-Year Prospective Study.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the remission rate with short-term premixed insulin therapy in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes outpatients and investigate predictors contributing to the remission rate. A 5-year prospective study was conducted with a total of 170 patients enrolled. Patients were treated with premixed insulin monotherapy or insulin in combination with one or two oral drugs. After glucose levels were well controlled, insulin and oral drugs were discontinued in a stepwise manner. The prolonged and partial remission rates were calculated and the possible factors contributing to remission were also analyzed. A total of 164 subjects completed the research study. The prolonged remission, partial remission and non-remission rates at the 5-year follow-up were 9.8, 59.8, and 30.5%, respectively. The remission rate was negatively correlated with disease duration (r=0.39). The combined rate of remission (prolonged and partial remission) significantly decreased when the duration was longer than 16 days, and reduced to approximately 50% after 1 month. Moreover, 75% of prolonged remission patients had duration of < 16 days. At the 5-year follow-up, the prolonged remission rate was 9.8% and the partial remission rate was 59.8%. Furthermore, the duration after diagnosis is an independent predictor of remission rate, and initiation of short-term premixed insulin therapy within the first 16 days of diabetes diagnosis is very important for remission. This is the first study to evaluate the remission rate associated with short-term premixed insulin therapy in recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes outpatients. At the 5-year follow-up, the prolonged remission rate was 9.8% and the partial remission rate was 59.8%. The duration of diabetes was identified as an independent predictor of drug-free remission. The initiation of short-term premixed insulin therapy within 15 days of diabetes onset is particular importance for remission.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist therapy is more efficacious than insulin glargine for poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare the reported efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-l receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) and insulin glargine (IGlar) for poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov were carried out. References and cited papers of relevant articles were also checked. RESULTS: Seven trials met the inclusion criteria. GLP-1RA showed equivalent or superior efficacy to IGlar for reducing hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), with a greater proportion of patients achieving HbAlc<7%. GLP-1RA also favored decreased body weight, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and systolic blood pressure (SBP). Serious adverse events were uncommon and not significantly different. More patients taking GLP-1RA experienced gastrointestinal complications: nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting. Severe hypoglycemia events were rare, and minor hypoglycemia was less common for GLP-1RA. CONCLUSIONS: GLP-1RA showed greater efficacy compared to IGlar for type 2 diabetes, and it may also prove beneficial for other diabetes-associated characteristics, including obesity, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia.

Autologous bone marrow stem cell transplantation in critical limb ischemia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Amputation-free survival (AFS) has been recommended as the gold standard for evaluating No-Option Critical Limb Ischemia (NO-CLI) therapy. Early-phase clinical trials suggest that autologous bone-marrow derived cells (BMCs) transplantation may have a positive effect on patients with NO-CLI, especially decreasing the incidence of amputation. However, the BMCs therapeutic efficacy remains controversial and whether BMCs therapy is suitable for all CLI patients is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by comparing autologous BMCs therapy with controls in patients with critical limb ischemia, and the primary endpoint is the incidence of amputation. Pubmed, EBSCO and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (to approximately July 25, 2012) were searched. RESULTS: Seven RCTs with 373 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis. Because serious disease was the main reason leading to amputation in one trial, six studies with 333 patients were finally included in the meta-analysis. Pooling the data of the final six studies, we found that BMCs therapy significantly decreased the incidence of amputation in patients with CLI (odds ratio (OR), 0.37; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.22 to 0.62; P = 0.0002), and the efficacy had not significantly declined within 6 months after BMCs were transplanted; OR, 0.33; 95%CI, 0.16 to 0.70; P = 0.004 within 6 months and OR, 0.30; 95%CI, 0.11 to 0.79; P = 0.01 within 3 months. The rate of AFS after BMCs therapy was significantly increased in patients with Rutherford class 5 CLI (OR 3.28; 95%CI, 1.12 to 9.65; P = 0.03), while there was no significant improvement in patients with Rutherford class 4 (OR 0.35; 95%CI, 0.05 to 2.33; P = 0.28) compared with controls. The BMCs therapy also improved ulcer healing (OR, 5.83; 95%CI, 2.37 to 14.29; P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that autologous BMCs therapy has a beneficial effect in decreasing the incidence of amputation and the efficacy does not decrease significantly within 6 months after BMCs transplantation. Patients with Rutherford class 5 are suitable for BMCs therapy, while the efficiency in patients with Rutherford 4 needs further evaluation.